© 2024 Connecticut Public

FCC Public Inspection Files:
WPKT · WRLI-FM · WEDW-FM · Public Files Contact
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Cancer Answers is hosted by Dr. Anees Chagpar, Associate Professor of Surgical Oncology and Director of The Breast Center at Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven Hospital, and Dr. Francine Foss, Professor of Medical Oncology. The show features a guest cancer specialist who will share the most recent advances in cancer therapy and respond to listeners questions. Myths, facts and advances in cancer diagnosis and treatment are discussed, with a different focus eachweek. Nationally acclaimed specialists in various types of cancer research, diagnosis, and treatment discuss common misconceptions about the disease and respond to questions from the community.Listeners can submit questions to be answered on the program at canceranswers@yale.edu or by leaving a message at (888) 234-4YCC. As a resource, archived programs from 2006 through the present are available in both audio and written versions on the Yale Cancer Center website.

Federal Regulators Halt Study of Cancer Risks at Seven Nuclear Plants

Nuclear Regulatory Commission flickr.com/photos/nrcgov/6517600977/
Creative Commons
Millstone Power Station, Units 2 and 3, Waterford, CT

Federal regulators are halting a five-year study of the risk of cancer in communities around six U.S. nuclear plants and a nuclear fuel site, including two Connecticut nuclear plants.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission said Tuesday that remaining work on a pilot study would take too long and cost too much, at $8 million. It's already spent $1.5 million. Completing the pilot study and subsequent nationwide reviews could take eight to ten years.

NRCspokesman Scott Burnell told WSHU Public Radio that the agency doesn’t believe the radioactive materials released by nuclear power plants pose a big enough risk to justify the time and expense.

“Even when nuclear power plants do have controlled and monitored releases into the environment, you end up with potential doses to the public that are so low, it’s very difficult to assign an increase in risk from these very small doses,” Burnell said.

The commission said it will continue to work from a 1990 study by the National Cancer Institute. That study showed no increased risk of cancer for people who live near nuclear power plants.

Anti-nuclear power group Beyond Nuclear said halting the study is outrageous, and that funding it is a legitimate cost.

In addition to the Connecticut plants, Millstone and Connecticut Yankee, other nuclear sites to be studied included active and decommissioned plants in California, Illinois, Michigan, and New Jersey, and a nuclear fuel fabrication plant in Tennessee.

Leyda Quast is an intern at WNPR. This report includes information from The Associated Press.

Stand up for civility

This news story is funded in large part by Connecticut Public’s Members — listeners, viewers, and readers like you who value fact-based journalism and trustworthy information.

We hope their support inspires you to donate so that we can continue telling stories that inform, educate, and inspire you and your neighbors. As a community-supported public media service, Connecticut Public has relied on donor support for more than 50 years.

Your donation today will allow us to continue this work on your behalf. Give today at any amount and join the 50,000 members who are building a better—and more civil—Connecticut to live, work, and play.

Related Content