© 2025 Connecticut Public

FCC Public Inspection Files:
WEDH · WEDN · WEDW · WEDY
WEDW-FM · WNPR · WPKT · WRLI-FM
Public Files Contact · ATSC 3.0 FAQ
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Study Questions Reliability of Cardiac Defibrillators

RENEE MONTAGNE, host:

Cardiac defibrillators are as small as pagers and can rescue people from sudden death. Vice President Dick Cheney has one and they're one of the fastest growing items in the medical device market. Now, a new report in the Journal of the American Medical Association finds the devices malfunction at unexpectedly high rates, as NPR's Snigdha Prakash reports.

SNIGDHA PRAKASH reporting:

More than a hundred thousand Americans had these devices inserted beneath their skin last year. Their very lives may depend on them, and yet, says cardiologist William Maisel of Boston's Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, information on these devices can be hard to come by.

Dr. WILLIAM MAISEL (Cardiologist, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston) Remarkably, if you were interested in purchasing a car you can get much more information regarding crash safety testing, reliability, performance of the engine, gas mileage, all the things that go into a important decision such as purchasing a car you're not able to do when you're trying to purchase a lifesaving device.

PRAKASH: Using information given by the manufacturers to the Food and Drug Administration but not to the public, Maisel has, for the first time, analyzed how reliable these lifesaving devices really are. He says the results are surprising. From 1990 to 2002, an average of one in 50 defibrillators malfunctioned. Two years ago, Maisel surveyed physicians and asked them how reliable they thought these devices were. Most physicians thought that one in a thousand or one in ten thousand malfunctioned.

Dr. MAISEL: I think there is a great misperception about device reliability among physicians. And I don't think that that is their fault. I think it's actually industry's fault for not providing a more realistic estimate of device performance.

PRAKASH: Under current law, manufacturers are free to decide which device problems are serious enough to tell the public and when. The risks of such a voluntary reporting system were highlighted last year when a 21-year-old college student suffered a cardiac arrest and died after his defibrillator malfunctioned.

It emerged that Guidant Corporation, which had made the device, had known about the problem but hadn't told physicians. The company subsequently recalled thousands of the devices. Maisel says the law has to be changed so that companies are required to give the public timely and specific information.

Dr. MAISEL: That information should include malfunction rates; it should include the number and type of malfunctions that have been observed, very detailed reporting of device performance.

PRAKASH: The Food and Drug Administration, which regulates the industry, says it would support fuller disclosure. Bram Zuckerman is director of the FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices.

Dr. BRAM ZUCKERMAN (Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices): The opportunity to make this information publicly available through the manufacturers product performance report would have a good public health affect, and the agency would work with manufacturers and physicians to make that a reality.

PRAKASH: The industry group that represents device manufacturers, AdvaMed, says many manufacturers are already doing that. Steve Ubl heads the group.

Mr. STEVE UBL (President, AdvaMed): But I think it's important not to lose the forest for the trees. I mean, defibrillators are a proven technology that have saved hundreds of thousands of lives.

PRAKASH: And on that issue, all sides agree. While growth in defibrillator sales has slowed over the past year because of concerns about safety, William Maisel says nothing in his paper should dissuade a patient who needs a defibrillator from getting one.

Snigdha Prakash, NPR News, Washington. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

Snigdha Prakash
Pieces by National Desk reporter Snigdha Prakash can be heard on NPR's All Things Considered and Morning Edition. The majority of Snigdha's past reports have focused on topics related to entrepreneurship, business, banking and the economy.

The independent journalism and non-commercial programming you rely on every day is in danger.

If you’re reading this, you believe in trusted journalism and in learning without paywalls. You value access to educational content kids love and enriching cultural programming.

Now all of that is at risk.

Federal funding for public media is under threat and if it goes, the impact to our communities will be devastating.

Together, we can defend it. It’s time to protect what matters.

Your voice has protected public media before. Now, it’s needed again. Learn how you can protect the news and programming you depend on.

SOMOS CONNECTICUT is an initiative from Connecticut Public, the state’s local NPR and PBS station, to elevate Latino stories and expand programming that uplifts and informs our Latino communities. Visit CTPublic.org/latino for more stories and resources. For updates, sign up for the SOMOS CONNECTICUT newsletter at ctpublic.org/newsletters.

SOMOS CONNECTICUT es una iniciativa de Connecticut Public, la emisora local de NPR y PBS del estado, que busca elevar nuestras historias latinas y expandir programación que alza y informa nuestras comunidades latinas locales. Visita CTPublic.org/latino para más reportajes y recursos. Para noticias, suscríbase a nuestro boletín informativo en ctpublic.org/newsletters.

The independent journalism and non-commercial programming you rely on every day is in danger.

If you’re reading this, you believe in trusted journalism and in learning without paywalls. You value access to educational content kids love and enriching cultural programming.

Now all of that is at risk.

Federal funding for public media is under threat and if it goes, the impact to our communities will be devastating.

Together, we can defend it. It’s time to protect what matters.

Your voice has protected public media before. Now, it’s needed again. Learn how you can protect the news and programming you depend on.

Related Content