© 2025 Connecticut Public

FCC Public Inspection Files:
WEDH · WEDN · WEDW · WEDY
WEDW-FM · WNPR · WPKT · WRLI-FM
Public Files Contact · ATSC 3.0 FAQ
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Satellite Imagery Shows a Sinking New Orleans

STEVE INSKEEP, host:

It's the first day of Hurricane Season 2006. And on this day, we are sorry to report that parts of New Orleans are sinking faster than anyone realized. Scientists have known for a long time that the city is slowly sinking; that's one reason that so much of it is below sea level. Scientists have been studying images of the city taken by a special kind of radar. And they say the rapid sagging may be one reason some of the levees failed to protect parts of the city last year. NPR's Christopher Joyce has more.

CHRISTOPHER JOYCE reporting:

Much of New Orleans is built on the geological equivalent of a down pillow: Mississippi River sediment. As that sediment dries and collapses it settles, and the city is settling with it.

About 50 years ago, scientists started measuring how much New Orleans was sinking. On average, the rate was about a fifth of an inch a year. Now, there's a new technique to measure sinking. It's a type of radar flown on a satellite.

Timothy Dixon, a geologist at the University of Miami, examined images of some 150,000 spots in the New Orleans metropolitan area. The average settling, or subsidence, was about the same as it was measured on land - about six millimeters a year. But in some places, along some levees, for instance, it was a lot worse.

Professor TIMOTHY DIXON (Director, Geodesy Lab, University of Miami): What we found was that some of the levees that failed in Katrina had extremely high rates of subsidence. That's a new finding. That had not been observed before with the leveling data, because they didn't run leveling lines on the levees.

JOYCE: Leveling lines are measurements much like those engineers make when they build roads or buildings. Dixon's satellite measurements - described in the scientific journal, Nature - are more detailed and cover more area. They showed that the levees along a navigation channel east of the city, known as the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, sank at five-times the average rate for the rest of the city.

Prof. DIXON: Our data suggests that with the subsidence rates we're seeing, the levees were probably a little bit lower than what they were originally designed for. And so that obviously contributes to them being overtopped.

JOYCE: Officials at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers say that after Katrina, they did discover that some levees were not actually as high as they were designed to be. Dixon and his scientific team say it's not just the levees that are sinking faster than realized, though. For example, the nearby community of Kenner, which is built on wetlands that have been drained, is sinking about three-times faster than the rest of the city.

Virginia Burkett is the scientist at the U.S. Geological Survey who has analyzed the ground-based measurement of subsidence. She found quite a bit of variation around the city, as well; though, not as much as Dixon did. But she says she's not surprised at the high numbers in some places.

Dr. VIRGINIA BURKETT (Chief, Forest Ecology Branch, National Wetlands Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey): For example, where we have artificial fill, the subsidence rates are much more rapid than they are on the natural levee deposits. So there's a lot of variability.

JOYCE: Artificial fill is sediment or other material dredged up and shipped in. Natural deposits were laid down over centuries by river flooding. Burkett and Dixon both say they are puzzled by one thing: Over time, as soils get dried out and compacted, the rate of sinking should slow down; but, instead, it speeds up and slows down unpredictably.

Dr. BURKETT: It's not a linear relationship. Through time, you'll see these episodes of subsidence, and it doesn't appear to be decreasing through time.

JOYCE: An engineer with the Army Corps, Al Naomi, says the corps is familiar with varying rates of subsidence and with Dixon's latest findings. He says the corps usually designs levees based on soil conditions they measure at each individual site, rather than on subsidence averages; and that if settling rates are unusually high, levee builders can just build higher.

Christopher Joyce, NPR News. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

Christopher Joyce is a correspondent on the science desk at NPR. His stories can be heard on all of NPR's news programs, including NPR's Morning Edition, All Things Considered, and Weekend Edition.

The independent journalism and non-commercial programming you rely on every day is in danger.

If you’re reading this, you believe in trusted journalism and in learning without paywalls. You value access to educational content kids love and enriching cultural programming.

Now all of that is at risk.

Federal funding for public media is under threat and if it goes, the impact to our communities will be devastating.

Together, we can defend it. It’s time to protect what matters.

Your voice has protected public media before. Now, it’s needed again. Learn how you can protect the news and programming you depend on.

SOMOS CONNECTICUT is an initiative from Connecticut Public, the state’s local NPR and PBS station, to elevate Latino stories and expand programming that uplifts and informs our Latino communities. Visit CTPublic.org/latino for more stories and resources. For updates, sign up for the SOMOS CONNECTICUT newsletter at ctpublic.org/newsletters.

SOMOS CONNECTICUT es una iniciativa de Connecticut Public, la emisora local de NPR y PBS del estado, que busca elevar nuestras historias latinas y expandir programación que alza y informa nuestras comunidades latinas locales. Visita CTPublic.org/latino para más reportajes y recursos. Para noticias, suscríbase a nuestro boletín informativo en ctpublic.org/newsletters.

The independent journalism and non-commercial programming you rely on every day is in danger.

If you’re reading this, you believe in trusted journalism and in learning without paywalls. You value access to educational content kids love and enriching cultural programming.

Now all of that is at risk.

Federal funding for public media is under threat and if it goes, the impact to our communities will be devastating.

Together, we can defend it. It’s time to protect what matters.

Your voice has protected public media before. Now, it’s needed again. Learn how you can protect the news and programming you depend on.