© 2025 Connecticut Public

FCC Public Inspection Files:
WEDH · WEDN · WEDW · WEDY
WEDW-FM · WNPR · WPKT · WRLI-FM
Public Files Contact · ATSC 3.0 FAQ
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Lawyers Say Esty's Workplace Leadership Doesn't Work In A #MeToo Moment

Chion Wolf
/
WNPR
Rep. Elizabeth Esty (file photo).

Earlier this week, Congresswoman Elizabeth Esty said she will not seek re-election to a fourth term. Esty announced the decision following criticism over how she handled a workplace harassment case involving her former chief of staff.

Esty’s office eventually terminated the employee, but not before both parties signed a detailed confidentiality agreement. But in today’s #MeToo moment, those contracts are getting increased scrutiny.

It took months for her office to investigate and eventually fire her then-chief of staff, Tony Baker.

A female employee reported she was a target of harassment by Baker, which included a death threat.

When Baker was fired in 2016, Esty said House employment lawyers “very strongly counseled” both sides to sign a confidentiality agreement.

“They said you really need to protect the office and you,” she said. “This is what you do. This will protect you.”

But it also protected Baker. While it muzzled him from talking, it also scrubbed any information about his bad behavior from personnel records.

“A severance agreement is a contract between the employer and the employee,” said Suzanne Goldberg, a professor at Columbia Law School and director of its center for Gender and Sexuality Law.

Goldberg said thanks to recent trends like the #MeToo movement, those contracts are changing.

“There is certainly much more skepticism toward non-disclosure agreements and confidentiality provisions and severance agreements today than there was even a year ago,” Goldberg said.

Esty said her handling of the firing was wrong. She said she should have acted quicker to suspend Baker -- and that she won’t run for re-election because of it.

But she said Baker’s level of access did raise real privacy concerns.

“He had keys to my apartment. He had my tax returns. He has passwords to all my accounts,” Esty said.

Nina Pirrotti is a partner at a New Haven law firm specializing in employment litigation.

She said it’s common for employers not to share details of a severance agreement, and that confidentiality can be important. But she said this case is different.

“It’s one thing to remain silent, or neutral,” Pirrotti said. “The agreement goes much further than that.”

She said it’s not common for a boss to recommend an employee like Baker for another job.

But that’s what Esty did, potentially allowing Baker, “to obtain another position -- and a position of power,” Pirrotti said, “without there being any indication that there was any concern about the manner in which he conducted himself in the workplace.”

Esty has since said it was wrong to give Baker a recommendation for a job.

Columbia’s Suzanne Goldberg said public skepticism of confidentiality clauses in agreements between public employees will only grow, especially when they’re related to serious workplace misconduct.

“What might have seemed completely routine in 2016, now when we look back with the knowledge that we have in the spring of 2018, seems surprising,” Goldberg said.

And out of that social shift, she said, hopefully -- more employees will feel comfortable reporting workplace abuse.

Patrick Skahill is a reporter and digital editor at Connecticut Public. Prior to becoming a reporter, he was the founding producer of Connecticut Public Radio's The Colin McEnroe Show, which began in 2009. Patrick's reporting has appeared on NPR's Morning Edition, Here & Now, and All Things Considered. He has also reported for the Marketplace Morning Report. He can be reached at pskahill@ctpublic.org.

The independent journalism and non-commercial programming you rely on every day is in danger.

If you’re reading this, you believe in trusted journalism and in learning without paywalls. You value access to educational content kids love and enriching cultural programming.

Now all of that is at risk.

Federal funding for public media is under threat and if it goes, the impact to our communities will be devastating.

Together, we can defend it. It’s time to protect what matters.

Your voice has protected public media before. Now, it’s needed again. Learn how you can protect the news and programming you depend on.

SOMOS CONNECTICUT is an initiative from Connecticut Public, the state’s local NPR and PBS station, to elevate Latino stories and expand programming that uplifts and informs our Latino communities. Visit CTPublic.org/latino for more stories and resources. For updates, sign up for the SOMOS CONNECTICUT newsletter at ctpublic.org/newsletters.

SOMOS CONNECTICUT es una iniciativa de Connecticut Public, la emisora local de NPR y PBS del estado, que busca elevar nuestras historias latinas y expandir programación que alza y informa nuestras comunidades latinas locales. Visita CTPublic.org/latino para más reportajes y recursos. Para noticias, suscríbase a nuestro boletín informativo en ctpublic.org/newsletters.

The independent journalism and non-commercial programming you rely on every day is in danger.

If you’re reading this, you believe in trusted journalism and in learning without paywalls. You value access to educational content kids love and enriching cultural programming.

Now all of that is at risk.

Federal funding for public media is under threat and if it goes, the impact to our communities will be devastating.

Together, we can defend it. It’s time to protect what matters.

Your voice has protected public media before. Now, it’s needed again. Learn how you can protect the news and programming you depend on.