© 2026 Connecticut Public

FCC Public Inspection Files:
WEDH · WEDN · WEDW · WEDY
WEDW-FM · WNPR · WPKT · WRLI-FM
Public Files Contact · ATSC 3.0 FAQ
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Judge expected to rule quickly on fate of New Hampshire motor vehicle inspections

An old "Official Inspection Station" sign on a former service station garage in New Hampshire on Sept. 22, 2025. (Dan Tuohy / NHPR)
Dan Tuohy
/
NHPR
Signs like this could be a thing of the past in the Granite State — depending on how a federal judge rules.

A federal judge is expected to decide soon on whether New Hampshire can proceed with its plan to end mandatory motor vehicle inspections on Jan. 31, or if doing so would put the state out of compliance with the federal Clean Air Act.

Lawyers for Gordon-Darby, the Kentucky-based firm that provides emissions testing equipment to more than 1,000 automobile repair shops statewide, told Judge Landya McCafferty on Thursday that the state’s termination of vehicle testing requires approval from the federal Environmental Protection Agency, something the state has not yet obtained.

Until New Hampshire receives that permission, said Allison Wood, Gordon-Darby’s attorney, emissions testing “remains enforceable under federal law.” A spokesperson for the EPA has said it could take as long as 18 months for the federal government to rule on the state’s request to end mandatory vehicle inspections.

Lawyers for the state contend that the company can’t yet seek to block the repeal of inspections because, for at least through the end of this month, those inspections are still mandatory.

They also told the judge that a decision from the EPA may not take a full 18 months: “This is not an ordinary case,” said Mark Lucas, an assistant attorney general for New Hampshire.

After hearing nearly two hours of arguments on a request to block the repeal of testing, McCafferty said she was concerned about “whiplash” for motorists who have been told inspections were set to expire. She also questioned the state on why it took six months from the passage of the repeal for it to submit its request to the EPA. McCafferty is expected to decide on Gordon-Darby’s request for an injunction blocking the repeal of testing by the end of the month.

Republican lawmakers in Concord included a provision ending mandatory inspections as part of the state budget passed last summer. Supporters said that there was little evidence that unsafe vehicles were the leading cause of crashes in the state, and that motorists should have the choice of whether or not to have their vehicles serviced.

A mechanic works on a vehicle at Weed Family Automotive, a service shop in Concord.
Elena Eberwein/NHPR
A mechanic works on a vehicle at Weed Family Automotive, a service shop in Concord.

Local car dealers and automobile repair shops, as well as personal injury lawyers, have warned about an inevitable increase in unsafe vehicles on New Hampshire roads without mandatory inspections. Some mechanics have said they plan to offer voluntary inspections for drivers who want their vehicle looked over.

Following the passage of the state budget, which contained the repeal of inspections, the New Hampshire Department of Safety and Department of Environmental Services began the process of submitting a request to the federal government to waive the emissions standards. But that formal request was not submitted until December. Before the EPA can approve or deny the state’s application, it will need to collect public comment on the matter.

Starting Feb. 1, New Hampshire will be in violation of the Clean Air Act if it no longer requires inspections, lawyers for Gordon-Darby said in court.

Gordon-Darby has a longstanding contract with New Hampshire to be the sole provider of emissions testing equipment, but there is no direct financial arrangement. Instead, Gordon-Darby receives a payment directly from repair shops each time they perform an inspection. In 2026, the firm expected to generate more than $4 million in revenue, money now in jeopardy.

Lawyers for the state told McCafferty that Gordon-Darby has the right to sue if it feels there has been a contractual violation, but that it doesn’t have standing to sue the government under provisions of the Clean Air Act.

Thursday's hearing did not focus on the environmental impact of ending emissions testing. Data provided by the state shows that about 5% of vehicles have failed inspection due to excessive tailpipe emissions, on average, over the past 5 years, and that the number continues to decline, likely because more electric vehicles are on the roads.

With the Jan. 31 deadline looming, many New Hampshire drivers have already begun skipping inspections. Gordon-Darby said that in November, there were 33% fewer inspections performed than in the same month last year, despite the mandate still being in effect.

Locally produced, locally powered

Behind the headlines you read on our website, there’s a dedicated team of journalists working hard to bring you local news you can trust. On any given day, that can look like:

  • • Reporters hustling to track down sources, get the facts and hold powerful officials accountable
  • • Producers coordinating interviews with people who offer perspectives that go beyond soundbites
  • • Editors carefully vetting our stories to make sure they’re accurate, fair and easy to follow

I believe that journalists, when we do our jobs well, can play a crucial role in connecting people and making communities stronger. But we can’t do this work without you.

Your donations, in any amount, can help keep independent journalism vibrant in New Hampshire — and accessible to everyone, no paywall required.

Dan Barrick

Sincerely,
Dan Barrick
News Director

As a general assignment reporter, I pursue breaking news as well as investigative pieces across a range of topics. I’m drawn to stories that are big and timely, as well as those that may appear small but tell us something larger about the state we live in. I also love a good tip, a good character, or a story that involves a boat ride.

Federal funding is gone.

Congress has eliminated all funding for public media.

That means $2.1 million per year that Connecticut Public relied on to deliver you news, information, and entertainment programs you enjoyed is gone.

The future of public media is in your hands.

All donations are appreciated, but we ask in this moment you consider starting a monthly gift as a Sustainer to help replace what’s been lost.

SOMOS CONNECTICUT is an initiative from Connecticut Public, the state’s local NPR and PBS station, to elevate Latino stories and expand programming that uplifts and informs our Latino communities. Visit CTPublic.org/latino for more stories and resources. For updates, sign up for the SOMOS CONNECTICUT newsletter at ctpublic.org/newsletters.

SOMOS CONNECTICUT es una iniciativa de Connecticut Public, la emisora local de NPR y PBS del estado, que busca elevar nuestras historias latinas y expandir programación que alza y informa nuestras comunidades latinas locales. Visita CTPublic.org/latino para más reportajes y recursos. Para noticias, suscríbase a nuestro boletín informativo en ctpublic.org/newsletters.

Federal funding is gone.

Congress has eliminated all funding for public media.

That means $2.1 million per year that Connecticut Public relied on to deliver you news, information, and entertainment programs you enjoyed is gone.

The future of public media is in your hands.

All donations are appreciated, but we ask in this moment you consider starting a monthly gift as a Sustainer to help replace what’s been lost.

Related Content