© 2026 Connecticut Public

FCC Public Inspection Files:
WEDH · WEDN · WEDW · WEDY
WEDW-FM · WNPR · WPKT · WRLI-FM
Public Files Contact · ATSC 3.0 FAQ
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Social media influencers called out for bad tennis etiquette at U.S. Open

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

It's not just the usual media types covering the U.S. Open this year. Social media influencers are in the house, or the stadium, as it were. And they are being blamed for breaches of tennis etiquette such as breaking out the ring cameras and taking selfies while matches are in play, annoying to other fans, and even worse distracting for the players on the courts. Cue the discourse. So we've called tennis writer Courtney Nguyen to get her take on all this. Good morning, Courtney.

COURTNEY NGUYEN: Good morning.

MARTIN: So what are some of the complaints about the behavior?

NGUYEN: Yeah, we've seen more of the type of influencer activity that would normally take place kind of outside of the stadium, you know, on the grounds, taking videos and things like that. This year, it's permeated into the stadium. And that's really been the issue. So we have people bringing ring lights in to take videos from there. We have suites coordinating these kind of, I don't know, song and dances, call-and-repeat-type things, all while matches are ongoing. And that's really been the spark for, as you said, the discourse surrounding what is proper behavior in a public sporting environment.

MARTIN: Have the players noticed this, and if so, what are they saying?

NGUYEN: Without a doubt. They have definitely noticed it. We've had play stopped in a Naomi Osaka match, with the umpire kind of calling out some of the disturbances in the crowd specifically related to content creation and content capture. And they have been a little bit frustrated by the fact that - they understand why this is being done. They understand that, you know, this is where younger people are getting their information now is on social media. And for tennis to grow, it's important to obviously be on those platforms. But their argument is, you know, we're here. We're working. This is one of the most prestigious events on our calendar. Please don't interrupt us while we're trying to actually play points. And that's really where the rub is taking place.

MARTIN: So who are these social media influencers?

NGUYEN: It's a great question because the USTA, which organizes the U.S. Open, has a content creator credentialing system. So they have about a hundred content creators that they have credentialed themselves as part of an outreach kind of program. None of those creators are the ones that are creating these disturbances that have been called out in these matches. So, effectively, by deduction, it's fans. It's fans who are there. Maybe they are influencers who have been brought in by, you know, brands to come in and get content. There's definitely a lot of that going on, on the ground. But they also can just be one-off fans who are trying to capture content for their own platforms.

MARTIN: I was going to ask you that because I was going to say, do we know for a fact that it is so-called influencers causing ruckus and not just fans acting up? Because I have to tell you, I have been to many a concert, especially since COVID, where I'm asking myself, where is the home training? I mean, I'm talking about people using their iPads...

NGUYEN: (Laughter).

MARTIN: ...To film the whole concert, so people behind you can't see it. I mean, really. So that's why I'm wondering why we're saying influencers. But do we know that that's really the case? Or is this just people who like taking pictures of themselves?

NGUYEN: Right, we don't know if that's the case because the definition of an influencer is still so convoluted. And it's imprecise, right? It's a term that we use to describe anybody capturing content. But technically, it's somebody who's trying to influence you - right? - sell you something, sell you a product, promote a brand. It's not clear that's happening here. And so that's where it's a little bit tricky.

MARTIN: Any idea what the Tennis Association's going to do about all this?

NGUYEN: Well, Wimbledon has already come out and said no influencers for next year. So obviously, it's starting to crack down a little bit. But as for the USTA, they've been, you know, informing people, giving more instructions about tennis etiquette.

MARTIN: All right. That is tennis writer Courtney Nguyen. Courtney, thank you.

NGUYEN: Thank you.

(SOUNDBITE OF THE SEVEN UPS' "DIMMED LIGHTS") Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Michel Martin is a host of Morning Edition.

Federal funding is gone.

Congress has eliminated all funding for public media.

That means $2.1 million per year that Connecticut Public relied on to deliver you news, information, and entertainment programs you enjoyed is gone.

The future of public media is in your hands.

All donations are appreciated, but we ask in this moment you consider starting a monthly gift as a Sustainer to help replace what’s been lost.

SOMOS CONNECTICUT is an initiative from Connecticut Public, the state’s local NPR and PBS station, to elevate Latino stories and expand programming that uplifts and informs our Latino communities. Visit CTPublic.org/latino for more stories and resources. For updates, sign up for the SOMOS CONNECTICUT newsletter at ctpublic.org/newsletters.

SOMOS CONNECTICUT es una iniciativa de Connecticut Public, la emisora local de NPR y PBS del estado, que busca elevar nuestras historias latinas y expandir programación que alza y informa nuestras comunidades latinas locales. Visita CTPublic.org/latino para más reportajes y recursos. Para noticias, suscríbase a nuestro boletín informativo en ctpublic.org/newsletters.

Federal funding is gone.

Congress has eliminated all funding for public media.

That means $2.1 million per year that Connecticut Public relied on to deliver you news, information, and entertainment programs you enjoyed is gone.

The future of public media is in your hands.

All donations are appreciated, but we ask in this moment you consider starting a monthly gift as a Sustainer to help replace what’s been lost.